Particles Moving Differently in Blood. Were Some Created by People?
Lazy Followers in Brownian Motion, and Stealth Spies (with update)
When I see something really exciting, I just want to post. Proper research and writing is going to have to take a backseat this time. This is too much much fun! When I was doing sound experiments yesterday, I caught some sleepy, ‘unconscious’ little particles grooving to the music in Brownian Motion. But then, as my gaze shifted to the bottom of the screen, I saw something else entirely.
They ambled quickly and carefully through spaces between blood cells from the righthand side of the screen to the left, as if on a mission. They looked smarter; more determined, maybe even programmed.
I had just eaten, so the moving particles didn’t surprise me. Most of them, could easily have been Chylomicrons: lipoprotein particles that arrive in the blood shortly after a meal. What surprised me was that not all of the particles were moving the same way. (If you know more about how biological particles - particularly Chylomicrons - are supposed to move in blood, please comment down below. They didn’t look right to me.)
In the top and central portions of the following video, you’ll see lots of small particles moving in Brownian motion. If you look over toward the lower righthand portion of the screen and you’ll see some stealth particles ambling confidently around red blood cells on their way to the other side. They’ve clearly got places to go and things to do! Some even take the time and trouble needed, to avoid clusters of fibrin that have developed in my blood. Wow! They must be smart.
About midway through the video, a bigger, fatter, more colorful particle shows up. At first it’s dressed in red, white and green. Later, on it’s way from the lower righthand part of the screen leftward, it becomes more of whitish blob. Hum… Did it get hot and sweaty, and disrobe? If you look closely, it slows down and stops for a second midway though and then turns white. Yup! It must have dropped it’s outfit. How embarrassing!
Particles Moving in Blood (Darkfield) - Aged one and a half hours.
The larger particle makes it’s appearance on the lower right about 25 seconds in. It stops and turns white at about 36-37 seconds. (It finds it’s self in an empty space; stops, as if it needs a second to think; turns white, and proceeds.)
Are any of the particles that seem to move independently technological in nature? Maybe. They certainly move differently than the others. They could be bacterial in nature. If so, they might be entirely natural, but not necessary. Nanotechnology developers have found ways of reaching their goals through the use of biological materials.
If you’re interested in this topic, and eager to figure out why some particles may appear to move differently, you might be interested in this article on Micro/Nano Motors (MNMs): Chen, Qianfan and Kang Lian. “Self-Propelled Nanoswimmers in Biomedical Sensing,” WILEY ADVANCED, First Published 01 June 2023, ADVANCED SENSOR RESEARCH, Volume 2, Issue 9, September 2023, 2300056, https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adsr.202300056
Of course, the video I took of my blood and the article above, don’t proved anything in particular about our particles of interest. They do, however, suggest that particles, such as these, could be technological in nature.
Qianfan Chen and Kang Lian, indicate that Micro/Nano Motors have “Stable power…,” and “Controllable direction….” and can “break the constraints of Brownian motion.” Their article also discusses earlier work done with nanorods, “… activated by ultrasound.”
I haven’t exposed myself or my blood to ultrasound recently, but I did play a unique sound composition to this blood sample, for over an hour, prior to recording the video. I wonder if the sound waves could have had an effect. There were a few red, white, and green, moving particles in the sample, but they were all in Brownian motion — no fancy footwork like you see here.
Update: CHECK OUT THE COMMENTS SECTION
Two days after I posted this, I received a comment about how the movement could easily be explained by other things. Here’s my comment to that comment. For the original see the comments section down below:
“Thanks so much for your comments! Researchers and others (including me) misinterpret and mislabel an enormous number of things out of ignorance. There aren't many I'm aware of that are part of an intentional psyop, but being wrong is probably common. I'm taking online classes as fast as I can in biology, chemistry, nanotechnology, etc., so I don't make these kinds of mistakes. But, I obviously still do. The existence of Nanotechnology and the Transhuman Agenda aren't psyops. You can take college courses in nanotechnology development, and there are endless official documents and studies you can find on the use of programmed nanotechnology in medicine, agriculture, consumer products, etc. This doesn't contradict the fact that It's very easy to study all of this stuff, and get the details wrong. I DO think about the fact that what I'm seeing might be normal within the context of biology, chemistry, physics, etc. And, I did think about it when I posted this. (I was hoping someone like you would come along and say something like this to help clear the haze a bit. Because I know I can’t know everything.) I'm going to update his post right now, with my reply to your comment. Thanks again.”
Let me know what you think!
Daisy
Haha, I like your lighthearted outlook to whatever it is thats going on.
Do you have an EMF meter, like a Trifield? They arent too expensive and would be useful for some of your experiments.
Playing songs or music to a sample is a complex issue, because all speakers or headphones use an electromagnet driver to make noise. So placing the sample close to a speaker may introduce unwanted EMF.
The same with putting it near your laptop, the laptop is generating EMF fields of its own, irrespective of the speakers but an EMF meter would help determine the EMF wherever you place it.
There are also magnetically shielded speakers that you can get for cheap on ebay, they used to be popular back when people had CRT monitors and TVs, that may help you play sound to a sample without introducing EMF.
I would try to find some that do the widest frequency range possible, since (to oversimplify) 'music' as we think of it typically ranges from 20 hertz to 20,000 hertz.
You wont find any that do the Full 20-20k without spending a lot but human voice is around 100 hertz, so for accurate voice reproduction, you would need some that go down to 70 or 80 hz. And if you have an EMF meter, you can verify it is only getting Sound and not EMF from the speaker driver magnet.
Or perhaps put the sample in a copper screen cage (like a diy faraday cage) to isolate it from all external radio frequencies.
I have also wondered what happens to your samples in the presence of a strong magnetic field, like from a neodymium magnet under the slide.
Or in the presence of low-dose ionizing radiation, like from uranium glass or a 'geiger check source' like on ebay.
They have rocks that give off low radiation or little slugs of cesium or metals sealed in resin, that people use to verify their geiger counter is working.
So much to learn, so little time.
In any case, thanks for all you do and take care, Daisy.
When you take electrogravitics into account - the agency of virtually all materials - the possibility to steer with signals, cellular, the 4th phase of water with EZ zones etc -
certain materials can seemingly move like that and also halt for a while. Charge, temp, pressure... so many factors. When you realise that they lied about the DNA "molecule" a lot of the synthetic bio literature falls away and it seems more like a psyop at this point. Of course, there is the assembly of the mesogenic fibers but every crystal can be "programmed" through bioelectricity alone. They just lie about the recreation of nature :-) I wrote about 2000 pages around these issues on my substack :-)