Preliminary Sound Experiments - Part 1

Interesting results, but no magic bullet - yet!

The week began on an optimistic note. I was ready to test everything the Internet had to offer in the way of sound frequencies and approaches to sound healing. My plan was to put my own blood on two slides for each test. I’d expose one of the slides to sound, and leave the other in a quiet place. Over the course of a few hours, I’d check both slides intermittently to see what was happening. When they were dry, I’d check them again and compare results.

I figured I’d start off with various selections from YouTube and purchase proper recordings and playback equipment later. I’ve long been suspicious of sound on YouTube. (It’s not like the powers-that-be are trying to heal us. Would they mess with frequencies on the Internet? Sure. Why not?)

In spite of these misgivings, I convinced myself to try YouTube anyway. I thought for sure I’d find something untouched if I searched for odd things like: religious chants, or silent frequency cures. And, one of these somethings would destroy at least some nanotech — easy. If that sounds like high levels of over confidence to you, yup —guilty as charged. I soon learned that I was either partly, or entirely, wrong in my initial assumptions.

There were changes, of course, but not the sort I wanted, except maybe… sometimes. Some tests offered promise in a way that was both iffy and vague, but left me feeling at least minimally hopeful. Certain sound selections seemed to have positive effects on blood, but did nothing to address the problem of nano-assembled microstructures. The positive blood effects could, and possibly should, provide fuel for further study. SOME of the results, on the other hand, provide better fuel for nightmares.

Over the course of four days, I experimented with: 1) a Rife frequency meant to cure a LOT of different diseases; 2) a 1111 Hz selection, (a subscriber suggested this); 3) a pineal gland activation composition; 4) a selection titled: “V.ACCINE D.ETOXIFICATION,” (I guess the author resorted to the periods to avoid having the post taken down); 5) a silent frequency cure for morgellons, and 6) a Vedic chant.

If you’re wondering if that was too much to do in that amount of time, you’re right to wonder. It was absolutely dizzying! The tests started out alright, but when test after test failed to produce the effects I wanted, I got utterly obsessed. “The next one has got to work!” I kept telling myself, as countless hours passed. Amidst all of the over confident chatter I was exposing myself to, some important things got left out, like: proper food, exercise, sunlight exposure, and most notably: a sufficient amount of sleep.

This invariably led to some forgetfulness, and even to deletion of important files. (I no longer have a reliable photographic record of blood changes that occurred in response to #’s 3 and 4 above.) Luckily, I remember some things.

There are several good reasons to view the sound experiments I conducted, and my thoughts on them, as preliminary observations only, rather than definitive results.

1. Drops of blood vary, even if taken within a minute or two of each other. This means, the samples I took for each test, were already different with, or without, the sound.

2. An issue I didn’t anticipate, was the possibility that my blood could change mid-testing, as a result of what I had to do to conduct the tests. Because some of the sound selections were quite short, I often had to run into ‘the sound room’ frequently, to make sure the appropriate selection kept playing. This necessarily exposed me, and my blood, to whatever was blaring from the laptop speakers.

   After looking at four separate selections on Day 2, my blood and I ended the day much worse off than we started. Was the Rife frequency, (the final test for the day), to blame? I’m tempted to say so, but I can’t be sure.

3. I downloaded all the sound selections I chose, so it would be possible to turn off the WIFI on my laptop while testing. That sounds great, right? Not so fast… Light and vibrations were still coming from my laptop, and the slides had to be placed near it, to get the full effect of the sound.

4. The rooms I put the slides in had different levels of ambient EMFs, as one of the rooms is closer to the router in the apartment nearby. Some of the slides receiving sound were placed in the lower EMF room, and others were placed in the one with higher EMFs. My plan was to see if EMF levels made a significant difference or not. I had, initially, planned to test EVERY sound compilation in both rooms.

   Four days later, and significantly more exhausted, I decided conducting all of the tests in both rooms was probably a waste of time, given that none had resulted in a significant decline in the number of suspicious microstructures.

   I did test 1111 Hz in both rooms, however, and noted that a blood sample on a slide in the low EMF room, without any sound, had structures in it that were missing from the one exposed to the sound in the room with the higher EMF levels. Judging from their appearance, however, it’s possible that the structures in questions were just contaminant fibers from clothing, or elsewhere.

5. There are tons of other variables that can affect tests, which is why repetition is paramount. The trouble is, I didn’t want to retest things that didn’t seem to work. In the future, if any tests show promising results, initially, I’ll repeat them.

The first sound frequency I tested was: “1111 Hz Cosmic Butterfly • Attract Miracles, Love & Wealth • Law of Attraction,” YouTube, Star Way Healing 15 July 2024 https://youtu.be/zY71vQN97Fs (Accessed 4 Aug 2025). (I’m not a giant fan of the ‘Law of Attraction,’ it just sounded better than some of the other 1111 Hz choices).

Picture #1 - My blood sample - Captured during the second 1111 Hz test. This sample was in the low EMF room and was not exposed to sound.

There were several speckled bluish objects like this one in the soundless sample. Although, specks can be a feature of nano-assembled microstructures, when they look like these did, they could easily be cloth fibers, instead.

Both the sound and soundless 1111 Hz samples contained generous supplies of the worm-like objects seen below.

Picture #2 - Suspicious white object in sample exposed to sound. (There were several in both samples). Parasite? Self-assembled Microstructure? Here’s why I think it could be nanotech-related:

Picture #3 - Darkfield image of the white object discussed above. (These appeared white in brightfield and dark in darkfield.)

Notice the bright dots in it? On a large screen, the one toward the top of the structure looks mostly greenish, and has a dash of red on the bottom. Sometimes, I see dots with these colors moving independently through blood plasma, as if on a mission. I’ve often thought Dr. Ana Mihalcea might be right to label these multi-colored dots ‘nanobots’, when I’ve seen them moving in blood. These dots, of course, aren’t moving. They seem to be part of the structure instead.

Unlike the blue object with the dots in it, seen in Picture #1, you can see more of an internal structure in the object above. It’s worth mentioning that this wasn’t always the case. The interior was a lot darker when I first saw it in the sample. When I took the slide off the microscope, and put it back on again several hours later, it was still pretty dark. Ten minutes after that, it lightened up a bit. That’s when I took this photo.

It probably lightened up after being exposed to the heat and light coming from the microscope. But… well… I also did something very, very weird to see if it would promote a change.

You know me and my magical thinking by now, right? Well… I thought, maybe, if it was an evil creation of some kind, it might respond to what I’d consider music with less than light undertones. (I played: “Iron Man” and “Paranoid” by Black Sabbath next to it for about 10 minutes.) I’ve decided to blame delirium for the incident. (Lack of sleep will do that to a person.) I’m not proud to admit it, but I thought the dots might move, or multiply, or something.

Whether it was the microscope light, (probably), or the Black Sabbath, the internal structure became more visible. Nothing moved though. So much for magical thinking! (I thought I should put all of the facts out there, in any case, for folks whose thinking is as magical as mine.)

The next sound frequency I tested was: “Healing of morgellons disease Silent Healing Frequency” YouTube, Silent Healing Frequencies 5th Dimension. 3 June 2023 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGFuxqny4io&t=6s (Accessed 4 Aug 2025)

When I looked at the first sample of blood I’d prepared for the test, I figured a morgellons cure would be just the right thing.

Picture #4 - This is what I saw before the testing began. It was intertwined with a bit of blood that had fallen just outside the area where I’d placed the coverslip. Picture #4 was taken two days later, as evidenced by the dust. I made this the ‘soundless’ sample.

Picture #5 - Sample that received the morgellons cure frequency (after about 3 hours) The frequency was played in the low EMF room.

The frequency didn’t seem to do anything to the worm-like objects in the samples. I did noticed one difference between the samples, however. The one that was exposed to the silent frequency decayed a lot more rapidly than the sample that wasn’t.

I noticed some negative physical symptoms, whenever I went into that room. I kept feeling like a headache was coming on. I suppose that’s to be expected. After all, the frequency is meant to eliminate something.

The next sound selection I tried was: “V.ACCINE D.TOXIFICATION,” YouTube, DrVirtual7 Empower Dynamics. 30 September 2019 https://youtu.be/cRhrpKyxebA (Accessed 5 August 2025)

That sound selection made me feel so sick, I cut the length of the experiment to one and a half hours, instead of three. I don’t remember seeing any significant differences between the samples in that amount of time, but I accidently deleted the footage I took, so I can’t go back and check.

After that, I resolved to subject myself only to sounds that felt nice when I heard them. I liked how I felt when I played: “15 Min - Pineal Gland Activation - 7,83 Hz (432 Hz) Schumann Resonance,” YouTube Inner Healing 10 June 2025 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBl85LgwdA8&list=PPSV (Accessed: 5 August 2025), so that was my next pick.

As with the previous two samples, I put the slide that would be exposed to sound in the low EMF room. When I examined the slides after about 2 1/2 hours, I only saw one notable difference. The red blood cells in the sample that had received sound were a lot rounder and healthier than the red blood cells that hadn’t been exposed to sound. There weren’t any nanotech-related differences, but the sound selection’s effect appeared to have been positive, overall.

The final test for that day was done with sound playing in the high EMF room. Maybe it was the EMF, but I doubt it, because what happened was significantly more dramatic than what resulted from subsequent sound tests in the same room.

Here’s what happened when I played: “A special frequency, a mini “cure all” Rife (Isochronic Tones 120 Hz) Pure Series,” YouTube Voff Uggla, 3 December 2012 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1r7ZBwHWBIg&list=PPSV (Accessed: 5 August 2025).

WHO INVITED THIS CREEPY FILAMENT?

Picture #6 - A portion of a filament that appeared in my blood after being exposed to the Rife frequency noted above.

This doesn’t look like anything that just fell on the slide, it looks like what it probably is: a nano-assembled microstructure.

Video #1 - Play the video to view the entire filament.

There were several other differences observed in the samples taken for this test. But, since this doesn’t look like a cure for nanotech infestation, I’ll save the other photos for paid subscribers. (Trust me, if I find anything that looks the tiniest bit like a cure, I’ll post all the photos I have for everyone to see).

The Rife frequency I tried for this test may be good for curing, lots and lots of diseases, as purported, but in this era, some of the sounds may interact with nanoparticles, recently introduced to human blood, in a less than desirable way.

I did more research on nanotechnology and sound, and learned some unsettling facts. In, “Nanoparticles and Sound: A Mini Review,” Otoo Seniagya MP* points out that: “In drug delivery, nanoparticles produce sound during movement to the target site, reducing their speed due to the sound – pressure interaction.” The sound-pressure interaction??? Oh that’s great! Now I can worry about how much pressure there is in my body and how it’s reacting to the veritable symphony of nanoparticles swimming around in there.

Otoo Seniagya goes on to explain that “…nano-coated drugs can be fabricated with sound.” Wait a minute! Does that mean eating pancakes, while listening my favorite Led Zeppelin or Motown tune, could cause a dangerous, drug-like reaction? Well, probably, not. Otoo Seniagya talks a lot about ultrasound being used to observe and sometimes affect nanoparticle behavior.

If we don’t have any ultrasound machines around, we’re in the clear right? Well, maybe, but it’s not clear how in the clear we might actually be. Authors on the subject indicate that they’re still learning about all the cool, (or not so cool), things certain frequencies of sound can do, vis-a-vis specific kinds of nanoparticles. The sentence in Otoo Seniagya article that disturbs me most is this one: “The interaction of sound with a particle affects the surrounding particles and can draw them together.”

Fabulous! That’s just wonderful! Does that mean, the air I inhaled as the airplane, making streaks in the sky passed, could have mixed with not-so-nano-free carrots in my soup, and collided with whatever was in the lotion I used this morning? Does it also infer that, while I was sitting there enjoying my lunch (music-free), and a car alarm went off outside my window, my lifespan could have been shortened — WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT? Well, yes, theoretically at least. But, it’s arguably more possible that that particular combination wouldn’t shorten anyone’s lifespan - not today, anyway. The fact is, we still don’t know much about exactly which sounds do what. That’s the crux of the problem right there!

Most of the articles I found on the subject of sound and nanotechnology were highly specialized and complex, but limited in scope. Researchers have experimented with higher and lower frequencies of ultrasound, and discovered that ultrasound in those ranges that can do an awful lot. They’ve also learned how to generate electrical fields with sound that can be used to affect the movement of nanoparticles (Kingery, 22 June 2021). A lot of other research has been done, but not enough to help the average person understand more, or exert control over anything. What I didn’t find in all of that searching, was any mention of the effects musical or frequency compositions, (like the ones I played on YouTube), might have on nanoparticles. Maybe the ‘official’ researchers will get there. Maybe, we’ll have to figure it out for ourselves.

You probably don’t need to worry about this overtaking your lunchtime routine just yet, though. Four years ago, you still needed special equipment to make this happen. Hang on! What are they installing on that telephone pole outside? (Just kidding - I hope.)

Privately, what really bugs me, is that I took eight blood samples from my fingers in the space of two days, and didn’t see anything resembling the filament in Picture #6 or Video #1, until I played that darn Rife frequency. Did it create new particles? Did it facilitate the assembly of the filament from nanoparticles that were already there? I don’t know. What I do know is that we’re in difficult and mysterious times. That’s for sure!

I ran out of space, before I could go over the results of the Vedic chant test. There were differences in the samples, but it’s hard to decipher what it all means. The chant deserves another test. More to come…

Daisy

Full references not listed above:

Otoo Seniagya, MP, “Nanoparticles and Sound: A Mini Review.” Crimson Publishers Polymer Science Peer Review Journal 3(5) 5 July 2022 PSPRJ 000573 2022 https://crimsonpublishers.com/psprj/fulltext/PSPRJ.000573

Kingery, Ken. “Sound-Induced Electric Fields Control the Tiniest Particles,” Duke Pratt School of Engineering, Duke Engineering Now Newsletter, 22 June 2021. https://pratt.duke.edu/news/acoustoelectronic-nanotweezer/

I ran out of space, before I could go over the results of the Vedic chant test. There were differences in the samples, but it’s hard to decipher what it all means. The chant deserves another test. More to come…

Daisy