Salt Crystal or Something More Sinister?

Check out this object and share your thoughts (see updated note at the end).

There are a few controversies in the microscopy research arena right now when it comes to the identification of self-assembled microstructures. Because optical microscopes typically can’t see objects smaller than 250-400 nanometers in size, lots of people, who are doing this kind of research, rely on the observation of larger structures to make educated guesses about their organic versus inorganic origin. They also often look at published research and patents to see if there is anything out there that provides evidence or information about what a certain thing might be.

I find it helpful to learn everything I can about how nanotechnology is designed. One way to do this, is to look at materials designed for students of nanotechnology. What you find out in this way can be shocking at times. I will be posting an educational video shortly that features a nanotechnology educator explaining that plants with chips in them can be monitored with mobile devices. Yup! He just came out and said that, like it was no secret at all! (See future post).

It’s quite clear that some circuit board-like objects (microchips?) are being put into some of what goes into our bodies. When it comes to identifying a particular squarish object, however, things can get tricky (at least for me). If it’s a normal crystal that develops in blood, such as a cholesterol or uric acid crystal, I generally know what I’m looking at, even if it has bubbles around it. But, the salt versus chip area is not my strongsuit.

It occurred to me that it would be a good idea to get some of your thoughts when it comes to crystal identification, so I’m posting one I found in Medifarma Saline Solution that makes ME very uncomfortable. I could be off here, because the piece on upper righthand side reminds me of metal, and metal reminds me of tools and machines. What’s inside also looks strange to me. Still, that’s not a terribly scientific way to come up with a hypothesis. There are well-seasoned researchers out there, such as: Dr. David Nixon and Mat Taylor, who have painstakingly watched objects with right angles develop and change over significant periods of time. That is not my specialty, or at least not yet. I’m sure everyone has their own way of assessing such things. I’m eager to read your comments and find out what you think.

Updated Note: When I looked for this photo in my hard drive this morning, I realized that I’d included: ‘With Wifi’ in the title. When people bring me medical items to test, I typically put a strong source of EMF next to the microscope, usually my mobile phone or laptop. To increase the EMF, I play one or more YouTube videos with sound next to the slide on the microscope. Currently, I pay a neighbor for the privilege of using her Wifi router, so I don’t have to have one in my apartment. I just wanted to make sure I added those details.

With thanks,

Daisy (Kathlyn)