Thanks for your comment. I really don't think they are yeast cells, because I received some training in recognizing those, and they don't look anything like the yeast cells I am familiar with. What they look like to me are nanocarriers, (manmade spheres that carry nano-sized particles). Those can reach very large sizes. There are lots of diagrams of these in educational materials for nanotechnology students. That's why I feel so sure about it. Having said that, at this stage in the game, I don't think many people can be 100% of much. I'm assuming the majority of them are liposomes, because those are used in many, many different products. Any and all comments that inspire additional thought are valuable and welcome. Thanks for yours.
Thank you again for your comments. The reason I thought none of the spheres I was seeing could be yeast, is that Candida in blood presents as clear, transparent spheres with very thin borders (that aren't black). Your comments, subsequently, sent me down an amazing rabbit hole! First I found a video on yeast under a microscope: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SQWnWwZM1E
This was made 4 years ago, but contains some very interesting images of expanding yeast. Looking at the video makes me wonder if other nanotech researchers could be getting things wrong in some cases when they see similar shapes and processes occurring. I checked all the photos in my first post on Spheres. The only photos in which I think could have misinterpreted yeast as nanocarriers are Picture #3, which is of papaya; Picture #5 (from a jar of Thai Curry); and Picture #7, which is an image of what I found in nasal spray. The Papaya COULD have yeast I suppose, due to it's sugar content, but it's also high on the list of GMO produce. Picture #7 contains black spheres like those in the video. But, I'm still not sure, as I don't know what yeast would be doing in nasal spray. But... I suppose it's possible. After sufficient consideration, the Spheres in Picture #5 of Thai Curry are good candidates for yeast. The spheres in my other photos in that post show multiple bilayers, or are a color or shape that doesn't match the images in the video or other images I've seen of yeast. This is not the case with ALL of the images I've posted in the past, so I'm going to have include some info. on this in a chat or update some of my posts. Happily, most of the spheres in my posts don't fit into this category.
Another interesting thing the video shows is large spheres with thick black spheres combining. I've seen this in blueberries and bandaids. I can understand this happening in fruit, but bandaids? There's lots of food for thought here. HANG ON! It gets better.
There’s a guy on instagram who shows all kinds of things under the microscope and most have obvious q-dots in them. He never mentions anything about them and I’m guessing either he thinks they are bubbles or that he knows exactly what they are and is just “testing” his g viewers to see who knows what they are OR he’s just normalizing them. No one responds to my comments and I’ve been saying they are a-dots, quantum dots, carriers of who knows what kind of tech..
Thanks. I tried to reactivate my Instagram account to look at the person’s page, and it didn’t work. So… I tried to open a new account. Instagram keeps saying they can’t open the page. I’ll have to try again later.
The most likely thing, is that the person simply doesn’t know what the bubbles/spheres are. When I first started out, the temptation was to think that most everything was natural. When I got over that, the temptation was to think that everything was nanotech. Luckily, I saw the danger in that right away, and signed up for a Live Blood Analysis Certification course. That helped when analyzing blood, but it didn’t help with parasites, nanocarriers, the differences between normal crystals and self assembled nanostructures, the differences between air bubbles and nanocarriers, the differences between nanobots and mobile flashing bacteria, etc. It’s very easy to identify things the wrong way or assume they are normal and not identify them at all.
Everyone seems to have trouble with some things, no matter how experienced they are. It took me months to acquire enough information on liposomes to feel comfortable enough to post that article. I could still have made some mistakes though.
If the person on Instagram is using an optical microscope (brightfield or darkfield) it shouldn’t be possible for them to see Quantum Dots, as those are between 2nm- 10nm (nm=nanometers) in size, which too small to see with an optical microscope. (This is something I checked into recently. A lot of people have been mistakenly using the term Quantum Dots to identify things that are much larger. (I hate to admit it, but I've done it too.) I will look at the Instagram posts when I can.
This nano tech has contaminated our lives since, at least, the 90’s and like evolving so rapidly that it has been normalized to everyone, especially “professional” lab techs/teachers/scientists/doctors and it’s likely unavoidable and always has been. Our task is to know thy self, know your enemy, learn discernment, and protect your soul because that is what the enemies want most. They want immortality, using our, uploaded souls on a chip/cloud. Look at the us patent on my notes regarding the human soul.
Thanks. I'm very concerned about the lack of focus on this, considering the potential size of the problem. The topic is so incredibly complex that I wrote and deleted pieces of this post for months, trying to get it right. I still ended up leaving a lot of valuable points out, because I couldn't verify their accuracy. Your compliment means a lot.
Agreed. My only positive thought about ANY nanotechnology goes to medicines that supposedly treat terminal illnesses. Of course, we should always avoid nano, and use natural and vibrational treatments instead. Unfortunately, they've done a great job of suppressing research on alternative cures, and related information, (sometimes even disappearing doctors in the process). I'm reminded of how scary it can be for people to recieve a potentially terminal diagnosis and not want to jump at the latest greatest medical cure on offer. I've done it myself. For the time being, I'd hate to take all of those 'cures' off the table before people are ready. (And, I don't mean inoculations - those need to go.) The world may need a bit of time to become: 1) educated about real cures; 2) horrified by the consequences of trusting nanotechnology; 3) ready to embrace alternatives. Funding for alternative cures also needs to be available for those that need it. This can happen, but it's going to be a journey..
These black circles could be yeast cells…RR
Thanks for your comment. I really don't think they are yeast cells, because I received some training in recognizing those, and they don't look anything like the yeast cells I am familiar with. What they look like to me are nanocarriers, (manmade spheres that carry nano-sized particles). Those can reach very large sizes. There are lots of diagrams of these in educational materials for nanotechnology students. That's why I feel so sure about it. Having said that, at this stage in the game, I don't think many people can be 100% of much. I'm assuming the majority of them are liposomes, because those are used in many, many different products. Any and all comments that inspire additional thought are valuable and welcome. Thanks for yours.
Well I found them in beer they look identical. I will post the pics on my chat. Also they are on Sams telegram Darkfield-Enigma.com ...RR
I have heard that Alcohol contains nanotech these days though. Yes. Please post your pictures.
I am trying to up load having difficulty...RR
Thank you again for your comments. The reason I thought none of the spheres I was seeing could be yeast, is that Candida in blood presents as clear, transparent spheres with very thin borders (that aren't black). Your comments, subsequently, sent me down an amazing rabbit hole! First I found a video on yeast under a microscope: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SQWnWwZM1E
This was made 4 years ago, but contains some very interesting images of expanding yeast. Looking at the video makes me wonder if other nanotech researchers could be getting things wrong in some cases when they see similar shapes and processes occurring. I checked all the photos in my first post on Spheres. The only photos in which I think could have misinterpreted yeast as nanocarriers are Picture #3, which is of papaya; Picture #5 (from a jar of Thai Curry); and Picture #7, which is an image of what I found in nasal spray. The Papaya COULD have yeast I suppose, due to it's sugar content, but it's also high on the list of GMO produce. Picture #7 contains black spheres like those in the video. But, I'm still not sure, as I don't know what yeast would be doing in nasal spray. But... I suppose it's possible. After sufficient consideration, the Spheres in Picture #5 of Thai Curry are good candidates for yeast. The spheres in my other photos in that post show multiple bilayers, or are a color or shape that doesn't match the images in the video or other images I've seen of yeast. This is not the case with ALL of the images I've posted in the past, so I'm going to have include some info. on this in a chat or update some of my posts. Happily, most of the spheres in my posts don't fit into this category.
Another interesting thing the video shows is large spheres with thick black spheres combining. I've seen this in blueberries and bandaids. I can understand this happening in fruit, but bandaids? There's lots of food for thought here. HANG ON! It gets better.
I later found an article that indicates that BIOBOTS are being formed to speed fermentation in beer. One of the ingredients being used in: BIOBOTS IS YEAST. Here is that 2023 article: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10134490/#:~:text=In%20this%20work%2C%20yeast%20cells,and%20keep%20their%20biological%20activity
I found a 2024 short on Youtube that shows some very strange spheres with white dots on their black borders in beer. This is the kind of thing I've seen in Ibprophen. My guess is that black spheres with white artificial-looking particles placed in the borders, (as seen in this video), could be Biobots, or represent evidence of other nanotech-related elements. Here is that video: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10134490/#:~:text=In%20this%20work%2C%20yeast%20cells,and%20keep%20their%20biological%20activity
This is the kind of thing that should be happening on Substack: Mutual Education! Thanks again for your comments!
Daisy
There’s a guy on instagram who shows all kinds of things under the microscope and most have obvious q-dots in them. He never mentions anything about them and I’m guessing either he thinks they are bubbles or that he knows exactly what they are and is just “testing” his g viewers to see who knows what they are OR he’s just normalizing them. No one responds to my comments and I’ve been saying they are a-dots, quantum dots, carriers of who knows what kind of tech..
Thanks. I tried to reactivate my Instagram account to look at the person’s page, and it didn’t work. So… I tried to open a new account. Instagram keeps saying they can’t open the page. I’ll have to try again later.
The most likely thing, is that the person simply doesn’t know what the bubbles/spheres are. When I first started out, the temptation was to think that most everything was natural. When I got over that, the temptation was to think that everything was nanotech. Luckily, I saw the danger in that right away, and signed up for a Live Blood Analysis Certification course. That helped when analyzing blood, but it didn’t help with parasites, nanocarriers, the differences between normal crystals and self assembled nanostructures, the differences between air bubbles and nanocarriers, the differences between nanobots and mobile flashing bacteria, etc. It’s very easy to identify things the wrong way or assume they are normal and not identify them at all.
Everyone seems to have trouble with some things, no matter how experienced they are. It took me months to acquire enough information on liposomes to feel comfortable enough to post that article. I could still have made some mistakes though.
If the person on Instagram is using an optical microscope (brightfield or darkfield) it shouldn’t be possible for them to see Quantum Dots, as those are between 2nm- 10nm (nm=nanometers) in size, which too small to see with an optical microscope. (This is something I checked into recently. A lot of people have been mistakenly using the term Quantum Dots to identify things that are much larger. (I hate to admit it, but I've done it too.) I will look at the Instagram posts when I can.
This nano tech has contaminated our lives since, at least, the 90’s and like evolving so rapidly that it has been normalized to everyone, especially “professional” lab techs/teachers/scientists/doctors and it’s likely unavoidable and always has been. Our task is to know thy self, know your enemy, learn discernment, and protect your soul because that is what the enemies want most. They want immortality, using our, uploaded souls on a chip/cloud. Look at the us patent on my notes regarding the human soul.
You don’t need instagram. ❤️
0.7microscope is the instagram page
The question becomes, what are they not in ?
In my opinion it is not a good idea to put anything into your body that doesn’t belong there. Especially if it is done over a long period of time.
It looks like there is no where to run, so we better find a way to get rid of this stuff and stop putting it into everything.
The unfortunate thing in my mind is that it is going to be a huge undertaking even if it starts at all.
We have to try though for the sake of our children and future generations.
Thanks again for getting the ball rolling to do just that.
Good valuable research, thanks Daisy.
Thanks. I'm very concerned about the lack of focus on this, considering the potential size of the problem. The topic is so incredibly complex that I wrote and deleted pieces of this post for months, trying to get it right. I still ended up leaving a lot of valuable points out, because I couldn't verify their accuracy. Your compliment means a lot.
Agreed. My only positive thought about ANY nanotechnology goes to medicines that supposedly treat terminal illnesses. Of course, we should always avoid nano, and use natural and vibrational treatments instead. Unfortunately, they've done a great job of suppressing research on alternative cures, and related information, (sometimes even disappearing doctors in the process). I'm reminded of how scary it can be for people to recieve a potentially terminal diagnosis and not want to jump at the latest greatest medical cure on offer. I've done it myself. For the time being, I'd hate to take all of those 'cures' off the table before people are ready. (And, I don't mean inoculations - those need to go.) The world may need a bit of time to become: 1) educated about real cures; 2) horrified by the consequences of trusting nanotechnology; 3) ready to embrace alternatives. Funding for alternative cures also needs to be available for those that need it. This can happen, but it's going to be a journey..