A very thought-provoking post - with some great pics and questions. Your YT video link provides some mind-expanding info on just how pervasive and yet unknown the effects of nanotech in foods are to our biological balance. On the other hand, since it's been widely applied for at least the last two decades, most of us can say that it seems relatively survivable. But the long-term and cumulative effect on our health and wellbeing is the unsettling question. We are apparently the unwitting subjects of increasing nanotech experimentation with no regard for our informed consent or the consequences thereafter. Deplorable industry ethics, but I knew that anyway. The desertification of civilisation's moral conscience has been obvious for centuries, along with the evaporation of accountability (pause rant).
One thing I'm pleased to learn is that nano-antics can sometimes be natural. The first time I looked closely at milk I was horrified, then later realised I was looking at Brownian Motion, not jittering microbots, and the clustered cellular structure among the wobbling fat globules was, in fact, a casein micelle - a natural self assembly apparently. That's one reassuring discovery at least. It certainly pays to research before speculating wildly. I like that you are adhereing to that principle, and I like the subject matter you're investigating. Nice work.
What great, thoughtful comments! Yes. I almost went into shock looking at raw milk one time. There's is a natural bacteria in raw milk that appears as a large number of spherical shapes. Even more concerning is the fact that this bacteria, (I'm not sure of the name), sends out bright flashes of light. Regardless of what it looks like, it's all natural and, for all I know, might even be good for the gut biome. Thanks again for your comments.
Good idea! A homegrown carrot would be the best, because companies, at least in the U.S., that grow organic carrots commercially, are allowed to utilize inputs that contain nanotechnology. At least that's what I understood from a video I watched that was produced in 2013.
Here's my email: khjean1964@gmail.com if you want to reach me. It's useful for me to look at someone's blood before recommending anything, as people have different kinds of imbalances. A lot of fruit is contaminated with nanotechnology these days, but if you have certain imbalances in your blood, it might still be better than whatever you are currently eating, depending on what your diet is like.
A very thought-provoking post - with some great pics and questions. Your YT video link provides some mind-expanding info on just how pervasive and yet unknown the effects of nanotech in foods are to our biological balance. On the other hand, since it's been widely applied for at least the last two decades, most of us can say that it seems relatively survivable. But the long-term and cumulative effect on our health and wellbeing is the unsettling question. We are apparently the unwitting subjects of increasing nanotech experimentation with no regard for our informed consent or the consequences thereafter. Deplorable industry ethics, but I knew that anyway. The desertification of civilisation's moral conscience has been obvious for centuries, along with the evaporation of accountability (pause rant).
One thing I'm pleased to learn is that nano-antics can sometimes be natural. The first time I looked closely at milk I was horrified, then later realised I was looking at Brownian Motion, not jittering microbots, and the clustered cellular structure among the wobbling fat globules was, in fact, a casein micelle - a natural self assembly apparently. That's one reassuring discovery at least. It certainly pays to research before speculating wildly. I like that you are adhereing to that principle, and I like the subject matter you're investigating. Nice work.
What great, thoughtful comments! Yes. I almost went into shock looking at raw milk one time. There's is a natural bacteria in raw milk that appears as a large number of spherical shapes. Even more concerning is the fact that this bacteria, (I'm not sure of the name), sends out bright flashes of light. Regardless of what it looks like, it's all natural and, for all I know, might even be good for the gut biome. Thanks again for your comments.
Will be nice if you find organic local carrot for trying the difference :)
Good idea! A homegrown carrot would be the best, because companies, at least in the U.S., that grow organic carrots commercially, are allowed to utilize inputs that contain nanotechnology. At least that's what I understood from a video I watched that was produced in 2013.
Yeah homegrow for see the difference :) thanx for your good work its appreciate
I saw that you were in ecuador im also there will be nice if we meet i want to know if a fruit based alimentation is better for my blood
Here's my email: khjean1964@gmail.com if you want to reach me. It's useful for me to look at someone's blood before recommending anything, as people have different kinds of imbalances. A lot of fruit is contaminated with nanotechnology these days, but if you have certain imbalances in your blood, it might still be better than whatever you are currently eating, depending on what your diet is like.
GREAT RESEARCH.... WHAT BAS#@&@S THEY ARE.....