Thank you for diving into this. I follow Karl C & Dr Ana (as well as trying to keep up with Dr Ardis), and my mind is in a whirl of confusion regarding Nanobots/nicotine. Everything seems to be conjecture, currently.
Thanks for your comment. Very difficult article to write with all the opposing viewpoints and 'politics' involved. I don't agree 100% with any specific article or video on the subject, but I do agree with some of it, and have good or bad 'feelings' related to various points. I had lots of other good footage available to show, but ran out of space. Maybe I'll dive into it again when I'm feeling more confident about my conclusions and guesses.
I am in the same boat as you... I feel so confused and frustrated when trying to find truth that I end up doing nothing. I don't trust any of the information given and really have no way to verify it myself. These posts and pics I truly feel are genuine as she has no motivation to deceive and actually admits to not knowing everything. It's refreshing!
I am so glad you, someone anyone has covered this. Maybe Dr Ardis like many others had not fully looked into Tobacco, but it along with Lettuce and Tomatoes have been ones to watch since 2018, maybe earlier.
Thank you for posting this article. Well done. I added your article to my SS paper: Venom of 2 Snakes are the Origin of the covid BioWeapon & Anti-Shedding, Anti-Covid, Anti-Venom Tea for Venom and then some...https://genevathatcher.substack.com/p/venom-of-2-snakes-are-the-origin
I bought some nicotinamide liposomal but it has something called plexozome in it a “nutrient delivery technology” does anyone know know where you can buy pure nicotine /tobacco?
Lipisomes are actually nanoparticle carriers. That doesn't mean they are automatically horrifically bad for you, but knowing those nanoparticles could really be anything, and not being inclined to trust modern supplement companies much, I wouldn't take Liposomal supplements if I could avoid it.
The very safest thing to do would be to grow a little bit of tobacco yourself, or offer to buy a regular amount from a friend or associate who has the space to organicly grow a little in their backyard or garden. All gardens these days end up being exposed to whatever comes down with chemtrails, but knowing what's gone into the growing of something provides the most safety.
I’m in Ecuador, so I can’t help find a supplier if you’re in the U.S. It should be possible for you or a friend of yours to find a way to grow it though, but I’m not sure where to get the seeds.
Are tobacco plants toxic in any way? Can you drink it as tea leaves? Thanks do you think the nicotinamide is safe to take? Can you get nicotine as an intravenous injection is it vitamin b3 or something?
No, Vitamin B3 is Niacin, which is not the same thing as Nicotine. Whether tobacco is toxic or not is still being debated. Lots of nanotech researchers think it's a good idea to take Nicotine in some form to help fill up your Nicotine Receptors, so other toxins in the vaccine and elsewhere don't use your Nicotine receptors themselves. It's a bit complicated, but is something you could research. I've done a lot of research on Nicotine, but can't remember all the places I have heard about the protective, anti-nanotech-related benefits of filling up your Nicotine Receptors. Sam of 'Sam's Substack' posted a good article about the benefits of nicotine awhile back. Dr. Brian Ardis says it helps fight 'venom related toxins' in the Covid-19:shots. But, he says, regular nicotine without chemicals isn't addictive. I'm not so sure about that. Yes, you can make a tea out of organic tobacco leaves. One time it helped me a lot to drink that while sick. Another time, it seemed to have a speedy effect on me, and I could only drink a little at a time. I wouldn't recommend taking anything by injection these days, because there's nanotech in most saline solutions, and a lot of injectable vitamins as well. I've never heard of nicotine injections anyway, but I suppose they could exist somewhere.
First, let me state that I am very appreciative of Daisy and few others who spend enormous amounts of time, effort and money trying to discern through their microscopes just what are the toxic "things" that are being added to our food, drink, medicine and air we breathe for the purpose (I think all agree) of making us sick, killing us, or transforming us into some sort of "living" machines. We, subscribers to the various substacks and social media, have seen thousands of pictures and videos-- blood cells being attacked (devoured?), lighted, colored things moving about, combining, disappearing, etc. Nano-bots, Morgellons, lipids, etc.-- different names for different things (hundreds+). Then, we have the discussions of how and with what to detox. I can only imagine these bastards who invent and work with these "things" watching and laughing at us. It is our human instinct to survive, to gain knowledge that drives you all to do what you do. I applaud your drive and conviction. But, what is being accomplished, and will we discover and learn enough to stop it and keep ourselves alive and healthy? I don't want to sound mean-spirited or pessimistic, but I wonder sometimes whether it is better to fight the unknown enemies or just try to have some quality of life, while it lasts.
For sure. I face that question every time I look at something under the microscope or put something in my mouth to eat. Just last night I struggled, as I usually do, with whether or not to eat a banana. Every banana I've found anywhere has been filled with black, organized spheres, (probably liposomes), containing who knows what. I need nutrition. We all do. There probably isn't a magic bullet. However, information is a good thing. Very few people know how bad our produce is. If enough people did, boycotts could be successful and MAYBE legislation governing the use of nanotech could be passed. These are small hopes and they don't even scratch the surface of the real problem: "Transhumanism, the Body Area Networks Sabrina Wallace talks about, inner surveillance, and mind control." Regardless of the apparent hopelessness. I feel a strong internal drive to do everything I can to help myself and humanity cope with this. I take breaks. I spend time enjoying life. I struggle with the apparent futility of the matter. I watch birds and kids playing. A mix of both works for me.
Totally agree, FreedomFighter - I’ve spent a long time now, trying to remedy the nanotech and the disinformation is, in my opinion, a psy-op. Like you say, they are laughing at us.
So do I continue trying to fix the problem or just make the most of my time left…
Hard to figure out. Since there are, in cigarettes, more than 200 plus additives to make them carcinogenic and addictive. For example, the cigarette paper is deliberately soaked in arsenic.
Yes. That's absolutely true. The evidence of possible nanotechnology at work in the products I looked at could be explained by meddling that has been done in the development of various individual chemicals. Still, if it's in that brand, it's in there. The thing that bothers me the most in this work is the fact that optical microscopes cannot see things below 250-400 nm. That's still a lot of space to work with at the nano level. So, even though Marlboro cigarettes 'look' okay nanotech-wise according to my tests, they very well might not be.
One of these days my plan is to eventually grow my own whole leaf organic tobacco, hand shred it, and then use that to make my own cigarettes. Need to find an alternative to the plastic filters however if anyone knows of a good one.
I currently smoke 1-2 cigarettes a day. Took it up about the same time the original poster did, for similar reasons. Only later did I start to discover the many beneficial health aspects of nicotine and the tobacco plant.
I will not smoke any commercially produced cigarettes. Currently I buy my loose tobacco from a local tobacco shop and hand inject the filter tubes myself.
I use cigarette holder on my roll ups. Smoke Golden Virginia tobacco, unbleached hemp papers, no filters, as they are causing cancers. I would recommend Sterling silver cigarette holder, should last a lifetime.
The reason why Brian Ardis started talking about it was that there were several studies that showed that smokers were dying less of covid in 2020, then several countries started putting restrictions on various kinds of nicotine purchases.
Well they were hard to find but what the studies actually showed was that Current Smokers died at a third the rate of Non-Smoker and Former-Smoker cohorts.
I imagine the real reason for that is because the sars-covs2 molecule is actually fragile, so smoking stops it from infecting the lungs, probably because it affects ACE2 upregulation on the surface of lung tissue.
Nicotine does bind to nicotine/acetylcholine receptors in the brain though so perhaps it helps prevent severe covid disease (if thats even a real thing) and relieves mental symptoms but...
Nicotine Does Not Stop You From Getting The Shedding.
It Also Does Not Dissolve Nanotech In Your Blood.
Its confusing because there is a lot of disinformation out there but those are the facts as we know them.
So smoke em if you got em and put on a patch if it makes you feel better, its nicotine so it probably will unless you take too much but EDTA and ascorbic acid Will dissolve the nanotech in your blood, if you take it right.
It is the best solution we have so far, in fact... Plus its like $40. And 22,000 times better than nicotine.
Okay I just made that up but its a Lot Lot better. Trust me... I actually Know.
EDTA, like a lot of protocols, has had numerous things written about it: some good, some awful. Figuring out which protocols will help the most, and cause the fewest health problems in the process, can be like navigating a minefield. Some of the information questioning the safety of various protocols is probably being put out there to prevent people from using perfectly good products. By the same token, it's possible that some protocols being touted, actually can damage our health, or have been promoted in the fake alternative media BECAUSE they cause health damage. I do my best to tell my live blood analysis clients everything I know about protocols: good and bad. At the end of all of that, I suggest that they use their own intuition and body sensations to determine what is best for them. We really are all a bit different. In my book, that matters quite a lot.
That is true, to each their own. People should do their own research, I surely did, Extensively but I try to help when I can. I have actually taken many of these things that help in fairly high doses, so I do have the added wisdom of experience, and a not too shabby research acumen compared to many it seems.
It is confusing though and there is a lot of old or flat-out wrong info, plus many people are just waking up to this reality, so answering questions in comments is sometimes like Groundhog Day.
As a side note to your article, in 2020 before Brian Ardis started talking about nicotine, I had already read those studies and had some heirloom tobacco plants going. So I crossed an heirloom Virginia Gold with a heirloom Vuelta Abajo, a strong cuban cigar tobacco to make my own breed.
Very strong tobacco, gives you a buzz like a strong nicotine patch just picking old leaves off or if you stick a leaf to your skin, and they are the strongest plant I have ever seen health-wise, they wont die for anything.
I actually didnt water some for like a month this summer but they still wouldnt die so eventually I felt bad and just started watering them again but unfortunately they are not the cure to nanotechnology in the blood or the shedding.
One thing we do not seem to have is verification of the effectiveness of Malic Acid and vitamin C/E, rather than EDTA and C. If you can get some pics/video of those type of results, I have a feeling there would be interested eyeballs.
I enjoyed your article though, thanks for the reply and good luck to you in any case.
Thanks for that suggestion. Do you have any thought on good doses to try? I can always try Malic Ácid and Vitamins C and E on myself, and take before and after footage.
Daisy, may I also suggest another source of Nicotinic Acid, which fulfills the role of receptor site occupation, blocking the 'spike protein's' ability to adhere. The product is a common, widely available vitamin suppliant known as vitamin B3, or Niacin. At the suggestion of my doctor, I began treating elevated cholesterol levels with a daily dosage of 3000 mg of pure Niacin. That was in 1992.
The brand I use is Rugby, and I buy the 1000 x 500 mg tablet container. It's reasonably priced and readily available. I find it in stock at Swanson's. Niacin's many beneficial applications are supported by numerous peer reviewed white papers on the subject. Non-addictive, and apparently not carcinogenic, though, considering the times we live in, it's difficult to be certain if any commercial product is not adulterated with S.M.A.R.T. nano-tech.
Just proves healthy skepticism is usefully applied to all things. A very curious and informative article. Can a timeline and source for "strategic planning" be reconstructed from this enquiry? Who or what is the big orchestrator? What else is bit connected to?
I don't have a strategy for dealing with my initial findings at this time. I am hoping my research will be helpful in generating further research and ideas.
The 'Orchestrators' of putting nanotechnology in nearly everything are many and varied. Some of them are relatively young people excitedly hopping aboard research teams they believe will bring humanity into a new and improved age. Lots of these folks think blending bodies and technology is a great idea - the wave of the future.
There is another group that has already shown itself, in World Economic Forum meetings and elsewhere, that would like to be in charge of organizing humanity into a convenient little pile of rule followers. These people don't seem to have any respect for bodily autonomy, free will, or frankly anyone who is not among mega rich. They look at everyone else as a tool to be eliminated or used.
Thank you for diving into this. I follow Karl C & Dr Ana (as well as trying to keep up with Dr Ardis), and my mind is in a whirl of confusion regarding Nanobots/nicotine. Everything seems to be conjecture, currently.
Thanks for your comment. Very difficult article to write with all the opposing viewpoints and 'politics' involved. I don't agree 100% with any specific article or video on the subject, but I do agree with some of it, and have good or bad 'feelings' related to various points. I had lots of other good footage available to show, but ran out of space. Maybe I'll dive into it again when I'm feeling more confident about my conclusions and guesses.
I am in the same boat as you... I feel so confused and frustrated when trying to find truth that I end up doing nothing. I don't trust any of the information given and really have no way to verify it myself. These posts and pics I truly feel are genuine as she has no motivation to deceive and actually admits to not knowing everything. It's refreshing!
Thanks. Josephine. Yup. Lying sucks!
I am so glad you, someone anyone has covered this. Maybe Dr Ardis like many others had not fully looked into Tobacco, but it along with Lettuce and Tomatoes have been ones to watch since 2018, maybe earlier.
Thank you for posting this article. Well done. I added your article to my SS paper: Venom of 2 Snakes are the Origin of the covid BioWeapon & Anti-Shedding, Anti-Covid, Anti-Venom Tea for Venom and then some...https://genevathatcher.substack.com/p/venom-of-2-snakes-are-the-origin
Nicotine also disables (temporarily) the nanotechnology on your tongue !
You can remove it with organic red wine by gargling repeatedly. It just falls out.
Try it.
I do nicotine lozenges and drink water,I can tell. My itvworks,I had tons of a o assembly in my eyes and now they are much less.
Wow! I don't want to take anything with Nanobots in them! Thank you for doing that really good microscopy work!
Thanks for your comments! Supportive words like yours fuel inspiration.
I bought some nicotinamide liposomal but it has something called plexozome in it a “nutrient delivery technology” does anyone know know where you can buy pure nicotine /tobacco?
Lipisomes are actually nanoparticle carriers. That doesn't mean they are automatically horrifically bad for you, but knowing those nanoparticles could really be anything, and not being inclined to trust modern supplement companies much, I wouldn't take Liposomal supplements if I could avoid it.
The very safest thing to do would be to grow a little bit of tobacco yourself, or offer to buy a regular amount from a friend or associate who has the space to organicly grow a little in their backyard or garden. All gardens these days end up being exposed to whatever comes down with chemtrails, but knowing what's gone into the growing of something provides the most safety.
Happen to know any places we could purchase a tobacco plant from? Thank you for your work.
I’m in Ecuador, so I can’t help find a supplier if you’re in the U.S. It should be possible for you or a friend of yours to find a way to grow it though, but I’m not sure where to get the seeds.
Are tobacco plants toxic in any way? Can you drink it as tea leaves? Thanks do you think the nicotinamide is safe to take? Can you get nicotine as an intravenous injection is it vitamin b3 or something?
My understanding is that nonflush Niacin (Vitamin B3) is pretty safe, but it's not related to Nicotine.
No, Vitamin B3 is Niacin, which is not the same thing as Nicotine. Whether tobacco is toxic or not is still being debated. Lots of nanotech researchers think it's a good idea to take Nicotine in some form to help fill up your Nicotine Receptors, so other toxins in the vaccine and elsewhere don't use your Nicotine receptors themselves. It's a bit complicated, but is something you could research. I've done a lot of research on Nicotine, but can't remember all the places I have heard about the protective, anti-nanotech-related benefits of filling up your Nicotine Receptors. Sam of 'Sam's Substack' posted a good article about the benefits of nicotine awhile back. Dr. Brian Ardis says it helps fight 'venom related toxins' in the Covid-19:shots. But, he says, regular nicotine without chemicals isn't addictive. I'm not so sure about that. Yes, you can make a tea out of organic tobacco leaves. One time it helped me a lot to drink that while sick. Another time, it seemed to have a speedy effect on me, and I could only drink a little at a time. I wouldn't recommend taking anything by injection these days, because there's nanotech in most saline solutions, and a lot of injectable vitamins as well. I've never heard of nicotine injections anyway, but I suppose they could exist somewhere.
Excellent work. It is a minefield out there between nanotech, spike proteins and mRNA.
Try Nic Nac Naturals, a gum.
First, let me state that I am very appreciative of Daisy and few others who spend enormous amounts of time, effort and money trying to discern through their microscopes just what are the toxic "things" that are being added to our food, drink, medicine and air we breathe for the purpose (I think all agree) of making us sick, killing us, or transforming us into some sort of "living" machines. We, subscribers to the various substacks and social media, have seen thousands of pictures and videos-- blood cells being attacked (devoured?), lighted, colored things moving about, combining, disappearing, etc. Nano-bots, Morgellons, lipids, etc.-- different names for different things (hundreds+). Then, we have the discussions of how and with what to detox. I can only imagine these bastards who invent and work with these "things" watching and laughing at us. It is our human instinct to survive, to gain knowledge that drives you all to do what you do. I applaud your drive and conviction. But, what is being accomplished, and will we discover and learn enough to stop it and keep ourselves alive and healthy? I don't want to sound mean-spirited or pessimistic, but I wonder sometimes whether it is better to fight the unknown enemies or just try to have some quality of life, while it lasts.
For sure. I face that question every time I look at something under the microscope or put something in my mouth to eat. Just last night I struggled, as I usually do, with whether or not to eat a banana. Every banana I've found anywhere has been filled with black, organized spheres, (probably liposomes), containing who knows what. I need nutrition. We all do. There probably isn't a magic bullet. However, information is a good thing. Very few people know how bad our produce is. If enough people did, boycotts could be successful and MAYBE legislation governing the use of nanotech could be passed. These are small hopes and they don't even scratch the surface of the real problem: "Transhumanism, the Body Area Networks Sabrina Wallace talks about, inner surveillance, and mind control." Regardless of the apparent hopelessness. I feel a strong internal drive to do everything I can to help myself and humanity cope with this. I take breaks. I spend time enjoying life. I struggle with the apparent futility of the matter. I watch birds and kids playing. A mix of both works for me.
Totally agree, FreedomFighter - I’ve spent a long time now, trying to remedy the nanotech and the disinformation is, in my opinion, a psy-op. Like you say, they are laughing at us.
So do I continue trying to fix the problem or just make the most of my time left…
See my reply to FreedomFighter above.
Thanks Daisy - I like the way you write, resonates…
Thank's Nick.
Hard to figure out. Since there are, in cigarettes, more than 200 plus additives to make them carcinogenic and addictive. For example, the cigarette paper is deliberately soaked in arsenic.
Yes. That's absolutely true. The evidence of possible nanotechnology at work in the products I looked at could be explained by meddling that has been done in the development of various individual chemicals. Still, if it's in that brand, it's in there. The thing that bothers me the most in this work is the fact that optical microscopes cannot see things below 250-400 nm. That's still a lot of space to work with at the nano level. So, even though Marlboro cigarettes 'look' okay nanotech-wise according to my tests, they very well might not be.
One of these days my plan is to eventually grow my own whole leaf organic tobacco, hand shred it, and then use that to make my own cigarettes. Need to find an alternative to the plastic filters however if anyone knows of a good one.
I currently smoke 1-2 cigarettes a day. Took it up about the same time the original poster did, for similar reasons. Only later did I start to discover the many beneficial health aspects of nicotine and the tobacco plant.
I will not smoke any commercially produced cigarettes. Currently I buy my loose tobacco from a local tobacco shop and hand inject the filter tubes myself.
When purchasing loose tobacco from an Indian reservation is there anything i should look or ask for besides organic? Thank you.
I’m not sure. Maybe someone else will know.
I use cigarette holder on my roll ups. Smoke Golden Virginia tobacco, unbleached hemp papers, no filters, as they are causing cancers. I would recommend Sterling silver cigarette holder, should last a lifetime.
The reason why Brian Ardis started talking about it was that there were several studies that showed that smokers were dying less of covid in 2020, then several countries started putting restrictions on various kinds of nicotine purchases.
Well they were hard to find but what the studies actually showed was that Current Smokers died at a third the rate of Non-Smoker and Former-Smoker cohorts.
I imagine the real reason for that is because the sars-covs2 molecule is actually fragile, so smoking stops it from infecting the lungs, probably because it affects ACE2 upregulation on the surface of lung tissue.
Nicotine does bind to nicotine/acetylcholine receptors in the brain though so perhaps it helps prevent severe covid disease (if thats even a real thing) and relieves mental symptoms but...
Nicotine Does Not Stop You From Getting The Shedding.
It Also Does Not Dissolve Nanotech In Your Blood.
Its confusing because there is a lot of disinformation out there but those are the facts as we know them.
So smoke em if you got em and put on a patch if it makes you feel better, its nicotine so it probably will unless you take too much but EDTA and ascorbic acid Will dissolve the nanotech in your blood, if you take it right.
It is the best solution we have so far, in fact... Plus its like $40. And 22,000 times better than nicotine.
Okay I just made that up but its a Lot Lot better. Trust me... I actually Know.
EDTA, like a lot of protocols, has had numerous things written about it: some good, some awful. Figuring out which protocols will help the most, and cause the fewest health problems in the process, can be like navigating a minefield. Some of the information questioning the safety of various protocols is probably being put out there to prevent people from using perfectly good products. By the same token, it's possible that some protocols being touted, actually can damage our health, or have been promoted in the fake alternative media BECAUSE they cause health damage. I do my best to tell my live blood analysis clients everything I know about protocols: good and bad. At the end of all of that, I suggest that they use their own intuition and body sensations to determine what is best for them. We really are all a bit different. In my book, that matters quite a lot.
That is true, to each their own. People should do their own research, I surely did, Extensively but I try to help when I can. I have actually taken many of these things that help in fairly high doses, so I do have the added wisdom of experience, and a not too shabby research acumen compared to many it seems.
It is confusing though and there is a lot of old or flat-out wrong info, plus many people are just waking up to this reality, so answering questions in comments is sometimes like Groundhog Day.
As a side note to your article, in 2020 before Brian Ardis started talking about nicotine, I had already read those studies and had some heirloom tobacco plants going. So I crossed an heirloom Virginia Gold with a heirloom Vuelta Abajo, a strong cuban cigar tobacco to make my own breed.
Very strong tobacco, gives you a buzz like a strong nicotine patch just picking old leaves off or if you stick a leaf to your skin, and they are the strongest plant I have ever seen health-wise, they wont die for anything.
I actually didnt water some for like a month this summer but they still wouldnt die so eventually I felt bad and just started watering them again but unfortunately they are not the cure to nanotechnology in the blood or the shedding.
One thing we do not seem to have is verification of the effectiveness of Malic Acid and vitamin C/E, rather than EDTA and C. If you can get some pics/video of those type of results, I have a feeling there would be interested eyeballs.
I enjoyed your article though, thanks for the reply and good luck to you in any case.
Thanks for that suggestion. Do you have any thought on good doses to try? I can always try Malic Ácid and Vitamins C and E on myself, and take before and after footage.
Daisy, may I also suggest another source of Nicotinic Acid, which fulfills the role of receptor site occupation, blocking the 'spike protein's' ability to adhere. The product is a common, widely available vitamin suppliant known as vitamin B3, or Niacin. At the suggestion of my doctor, I began treating elevated cholesterol levels with a daily dosage of 3000 mg of pure Niacin. That was in 1992.
The brand I use is Rugby, and I buy the 1000 x 500 mg tablet container. It's reasonably priced and readily available. I find it in stock at Swanson's. Niacin's many beneficial applications are supported by numerous peer reviewed white papers on the subject. Non-addictive, and apparently not carcinogenic, though, considering the times we live in, it's difficult to be certain if any commercial product is not adulterated with S.M.A.R.T. nano-tech.
Wow! That's a great suggestion! Thanks for that information. I'll pass it on.
Just proves healthy skepticism is usefully applied to all things. A very curious and informative article. Can a timeline and source for "strategic planning" be reconstructed from this enquiry? Who or what is the big orchestrator? What else is bit connected to?
I don't have a strategy for dealing with my initial findings at this time. I am hoping my research will be helpful in generating further research and ideas.
The 'Orchestrators' of putting nanotechnology in nearly everything are many and varied. Some of them are relatively young people excitedly hopping aboard research teams they believe will bring humanity into a new and improved age. Lots of these folks think blending bodies and technology is a great idea - the wave of the future.
There is another group that has already shown itself, in World Economic Forum meetings and elsewhere, that would like to be in charge of organizing humanity into a convenient little pile of rule followers. These people don't seem to have any respect for bodily autonomy, free will, or frankly anyone who is not among mega rich. They look at everyone else as a tool to be eliminated or used.
Some of my own questions were answered in the podcast https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/interview-with-intentional-podcast?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=12usie
Certainly worth listening to.
Because they’re already fully augmented